Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClarke, Damian
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Rudi
dc.contributor.authorSzklo, Michel
dc.coverage.spatialAmérica Latina y el Caribees_ES
dc.coverage.spatialBrasiles_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-27T21:16:39Z
dc.date.available2024-09-27T21:16:39Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-26
dc.identifier.citationClarke, D., Rocha, R., & Szklo, M. (2024, September 26). Does Increasing Public Spending in Health Improve Health? Lessons from a Constitutional Reform in Brazil. Retrieved from https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/2300en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/2300
dc.description.tableofcontentsThere is surprisingly scarce evidence regarding the extent to which and how government health expenditure affects health outcomes. Exploiting variation generated by Brazil’s 29th Constitutional Amendment, which mandated minimum thresholds for municipal spending on health, we examine the chain connecting government health spending to health inputs, production and outcomes, with a focus on infant mortality. We find relatively low average elasticities, but relevant heterogeneity in spending returns. Reductions in infant mortality are greater where baseline spending was lower, pointing to concave returns; where investments in infrastructure and personnel were complementary; and particularly where strong institutional and public management capabilities exist.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-NDes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectGobernabilidades_ES
dc.subjectSaludes_ES
dc.titleDoes Increasing Public Spending in Health Improve Health? Lessons from a Constitutional Reform in Braziles_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC-BY-NC-ND
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC-BY-NC-ND