Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStorper, Michaeles
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-15T20:04:10Z
dc.date.available2014-10-15T20:04:10Z
dc.date.issued2009es
dc.identifier.citationStorper, M. (2009). Local economic development. Some cities develop more than others: specialization, human capital and institutions. CAF Working paper, 2009/08, Caracas: CAF. Retrieved from http://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/201en
dc.identifier.urihttp://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/201
dc.description.tableofcontentsWhy does a certain metropolitan area grow more than another? The answer to this question has evaded much of the considerable body of scholarship on the topic. One problem may be that some of the frameworks that drive empirical research in this field tend be based on ad hoc combinations of explanatory factors, ranging from natural climate to business climate to land and labor costs. Theoretical approaches emphasize differences in economic specialization: some activities have higher rates of growth than others, and this translates into divergence in medium-term rates of inter-urban growth and income. But specialization itself needs to be explained. International economics has adopted theoretical frameworks for explaining different growth rates and income levels among countries involving multiple causes and their potentially recursive interactions. Three main forces are at the heart of this literature: specialization, labor force and human capital issues, and institutions. This framework can be fruitfully adapted to the analysis of metropolitan growth and change. The thorniest aspect of doing so is to consider recursive relationships among the three in a dynamic model, where specialization, human capital and institutions are endogenous to the explanation, and where causality can reverse over time in complex sequences. In this paper, we lay out the elements of such an approach and conclude that while explaining the origins of specialization remains beyond our grasp, many of the most important adjustments of regional economies can be explained. The most important force in adjustment is local institutions, but these must be understood in a non-conventional way, mostly as informal actor-networks. Policy for local economic development needs to address the ways it can nurture and support those actor-networks that play a constructive role in local economic development, by affecting patterns of specialization and development of human capital; and how it can replace or eliminate actor-networks that obstruct economic development.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherCAFes
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCAF Working paper, 2009/08es
dc.rightsCC-BY-NCes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectEducaciónes
dc.subjectDesarrolloes
dc.subjectEconomíaes
dc.subjectCiudadeses
dc.subjectFortalecimiento institucionales
dc.subjectInvestigación socioeconómicaes
dc.titleLocal economic development. Some cities develop more than others: specialization, human capital and institutionses
dc.typeworkingPaperes
dc.publisher.cityCaracases


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC-BY-NC
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC-BY-NC