Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPearlman, Sarahes
dc.identifier.citationPearlman, S. (2010). Flexibility matters: do more rigid loan contracts reduce demand for microfinance? CAF Working paper, 2010/10, Caracas: CAF.en_GB
dc.description.tableofcontentsDespite the rapid expansion of microfinance services in the past several decades, the low use of formal credit exhibited by poor households, the high dropout rates experienced by many microfinance institutions, and the prevalence of dual credit markets, even in the most saturated markets, suggest that microcredit may fail to meet the needs of many poor households. This paper examines the importance of repayment rigidity in explaining these three phenomena. While repayment terms are one of many components of a credit contract, they may be of paramount importance for poor borrowers who face high levels of risk and limited means to manage it. Flexible repayment terms are a common feature of the informal loans that dominate poor households‟ financial lives, and significant evidence suggests they are a valued feature of informal contracts. Examining the importance of flexibility may illuminate the role that microfinance plays in the lives of poor households and improve understanding of how it can be used most effectively as a poverty alleviation
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCAF Working paper, 2010/10es
dc.subjectSector financieroes
dc.subjectEquidad e inclusión sociales
dc.subjectInvestigación socioeconómicaes
dc.subjectInstituciones microfinancierases
dc.titleFlexibility matters: do more rigid loan contracts reduce demand for microfinance?es

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC-BY-NC